<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; newsfeed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vminformer.com/category/newsfeed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vminformer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:58:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco Nexus 1000v causes a Denial of Service in VMware ESX/ESXi</title>
		<link>http://www.vminformer.com/cisco-nexus-1000v-causes-a-denial-of-service-in-vmware-esxesxi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vminformer.com/cisco-nexus-1000v-causes-a-denial-of-service-in-vmware-esxesxi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 05:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spiv</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[newsfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cisco nexus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vminformer.com/?p=1765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[VMware today announced the release of a critical security patch for anyone who has deployed a Cisco Nexus 1000v virtual switch which replaces the VMware standard or distributed switch. VMware have provided a patch for this details of which can be found here: [Security-announce] VMSA-2011-0002 Cisco Nexus 1000V VEM updates address denial of service in &#8230; <a href="http://www.vminformer.com/cisco-nexus-1000v-causes-a-denial-of-service-in-vmware-esxesxi/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VMware today announced the release of a critical security patch for anyone who has deployed a Cisco Nexus 1000v virtual switch which replaces the VMware standard or distributed switch.</p>
<p>VMware have provided a patch for this details of which can be found here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2011-0002.html">[Security-announce] VMSA-2011-0002 Cisco Nexus 1000V VEM updates address denial of service in VMware ESX/ESXi</a></p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Cisco+Nexus+1000v+causes+a+Denial+of+Service+in+VMware+ESX%2FESXi+http%3A%2F%2Ftinyurl.com%2F4n7qqa4" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.vminformer.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter-big3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vminformer.com/cisco-nexus-1000v-causes-a-denial-of-service-in-vmware-esxesxi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sydney: VMinformer version 2.6</title>
		<link>http://www.vminformer.com/sydney-vminformer-version-26/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vminformer.com/sydney-vminformer-version-26/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 05:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spiv</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[company news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newsfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMinformer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual security compliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vminformer.com/?p=1728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[VMinformer has released it&#8217;s latest version of its leading virtualization assessment tool. “This version incorporates some significant improvements which our larger customers such as hosting providers and multi-national enterprises have requested” said John Reeman, CTO and founder. “The development team have improved the core functionality of rapidly providing visibility across thousands of virtualization settings with &#8230; <a href="http://www.vminformer.com/sydney-vminformer-version-26/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VMinformer has released it&#8217;s latest version of its leading virtualization assessment tool.  “This version incorporates some significant improvements which our larger customers such as hosting providers and multi-national enterprises have requested” said John Reeman, CTO and founder.  “The  development team have improved the core functionality of rapidly providing visibility across thousands of virtualization settings with better drill-down and zoom features which makes it easier to investigate larger storage arrays used in the largest virtualized infrastructures.” </p>
<blockquote><p><em>“Additionally, ESXi security policies have been augmented with groupings, so that the reporting and remediation advice is easier to classify.  Our users  benefit from clear categorization and can explain to senior management or some of the infrastructure team that are not skilled in all computing disciplines what the issues are and how to address them. Our consulting partners are particularly keen on this feature because it saves time in the reporting phase”  Reeman said.</p></blockquote>
<p></em></p>
<p><b>About VMinformer</b><br />
VMinformer is software that provides assurance that virtualized infrastructure is correctly configured and thus allows organisations to continue to reduce their IT operating costs by securely extending their virtualization deployments.</p>
<p>VMinformer’s flagship technology provides almost instantaneous virtualization security assessments saving many person-weeks of manual effort.  VMinformer is fully aligned with the virtualisation philosophy of reducing IT production and management costs.  VMinformer customers generally get a same month payback.  Founded in 2008,  VMinformer has successfully delivered high quality enterprise software solutions to the market both in Australia and overseas. VMinformer has an international presence across the globe, with offices in Australia, the UK.  It has specialised security policies for the United States and Japan.</p>
<p><bold>Interviews</bold><br />
Interviews with VMinformer CTO John Reeman can be arranged upon request.<br />
For further information contact:<br />
info@vminformer.com  <br />
Phone:   +61 (0)2 8004 5244</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Sydney%3A+VMinformer+version+2.6+http%3A%2F%2Ftinyurl.com%2F4hazyfv" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.vminformer.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter-big3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vminformer.com/sydney-vminformer-version-26/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Six Common Virtualization Security Risks</title>
		<link>http://www.vminformer.com/common-virtualization-security-risks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vminformer.com/common-virtualization-security-risks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 04:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spiv</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[newsfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Six virtualization security risks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vminformer.com/?p=1543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great article by Gartner on the top six virtualization security risks and how to combat them http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=9023]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article by Gartner on the top six virtualization security risks and how to combat them</p>
<p>http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=9023</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Six+Common+Virtualization+Security+Risks+http%3A%2F%2Ftinyurl.com%2F2fd6at2" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.vminformer.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter-big3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vminformer.com/common-virtualization-security-risks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good Design, Good Security? Not Necessarily!</title>
		<link>http://www.vminformer.com/good-design-good-security-not-necessarily/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vminformer.com/good-design-good-security-not-necessarily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spiv</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newsfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Good virtualization security design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualizations security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vminformer.com/?p=1358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone talks about good design principles when it comes to securing network infrastructures. It doesn&#8217;t matter if you are in a physical or virtual environment these basic design principles apply. But in reality especially in a virtual world are they enough combined with other techniques to raise the bar in terms of security? Design The &#8230; <a href="http://www.vminformer.com/good-design-good-security-not-necessarily/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone talks about good design principles when it comes to securing network infrastructures.  It doesn&#8217;t matter if you are in a physical or virtual environment these basic design principles apply.  But in reality especially in a virtual world are they enough combined with other techniques to raise the bar in terms of security?</p>
<h2><span style="color: #1e8eba;">Design</span></h2>
<p><img src="http://www.vminformer.com/image/VMware-design-BP.png" alt="Good Design" /></p>
<p>The above design is taken from VMware&#8217;s own best practice guidelines for good network design topology.  I&#8217;m not going to discuss if it is right or wrong what I am going to be asking is it right for you and should you just copy it?</p>
<h2><span style="color: #1e8eba;">Should I Copy Design&#8217;s?</span></h2>
<p>Depends how good they are I guess? But bottom line NO NO NO, DON&#8217;T BE STUPID!<br />
Would you after all leave your keys in your front door or give a shotgun to your kids to play with?<br />
Plenty of people and organizations have been guilty of the above even to the level of copying IP address information and default usernames and passwords.</p>
<p>If I had a dollar every time I heard someone say isolate the management network or isolate this network I would be a rich man. Isolation alone does not guarantee security.  It can help for sure but unlike the physical world it only takes a few clicks to add a new virtual network interface to a server and hey presto you have just bypassed your firewall by linking your DMZ servers to your internal LAN.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #1e8eba;">Virtualization Security, VirtSec, Security Virtualization?</span></h2>
<p>Slightly different things depending on your perspective.  Virtualization isn&#8217;t necessarily any less secure or more secure than traditional physical infrastructure, some people might differ!  Virtualization because of its dynamic nature just lends itself to becoming less secure either because of lack of knowledge, the gun-ho approach taken to roll it out or just plain and simple mistakes combined with not enough awareness.</p>
<p>Surely if I have a firewall and install anti-virus and various other security measures I must be secure it&#8217;s better than nothing right?  Not necessarily so in my opinion you will be giving yourself a false sense of security.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #1e8eba;">Know your Enemy and Risks</span></h2>
<p>Ultimately know your enemy or at least have an idea and understand what your risks are.  What are you ultimately trying to protect?  If it is data which invariably it is where is it?, how is currently protected? and how valuable is it compared to the controls you need to put in place to protect it?  When doing a risk analysis work out the series of events that could occur and then evaluate them on how likely they are to occur and then weight them.  Going through this kind of exercise will prove invaluable later on and may turn up some interesting results that you may never have thought of.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #1e8eba;">Know what&#8217;s going on&#8230;</span></h2>
<p>AUDIT, AUDIT and AUDIT some more. If you don&#8217;t keep any eye on what is going on in your virtual environment you will never be able to provide adequate security measures to protect it.  Don&#8217;t just simply do this for a tick in the box for compliance.  Do this because you need to drive security measures within your virtual environment and be able to provide accountability not just lip service to the compliance auditors.</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Good+Design%2C+Good+Security%3F+Not+Necessarily%21+http%3A%2F%2Ftinyurl.com%2F3yyzwq5" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.vminformer.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter-big3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vminformer.com/good-design-good-security-not-necessarily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cloud computing suicide</title>
		<link>http://www.vminformer.com/cloud-computing-suicide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vminformer.com/cloud-computing-suicide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spiv</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newsfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing suicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud suicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insecurity of the cloud]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vminformer.com/?p=728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Idiotic buzz words! There are many buzz words and hype the computer industry has created over the last decade.  If I had to pick my number one phrase for being the most misused, annoying and idiotic it would be &#8220;Cloud Computing&#8221; or &#8220;Cloud Services&#8221; and any other usage of the word &#8220;Cloud&#8221; in this context. &#8230; <a href="http://www.vminformer.com/cloud-computing-suicide/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Idiotic buzz words!</h2>
<p>There are many buzz words and hype the computer industry has created over the last decade.  If I had to pick my number one phrase for being the most misused, annoying and idiotic it would be &#8220;Cloud Computing&#8221; or &#8220;Cloud Services&#8221; and any other usage of the word &#8220;Cloud&#8221; in this context.  The industry in general is now using terms like &#8220;Private Cloud&#8221; what planet have these people stepped off?  It&#8217;s a building with a bunch of computers in, umm now let me think wasn&#8217;t that my datacenter?!!  Also didn&#8217;t we have other terms like &#8220;Intranets&#8221;, &#8220;Extranets&#8221; and other &#8220;nets&#8221; to describe separate networks, come on!</p>
<p>This industry also seems to enjoy creating new acronyms for things and although I am not against acronyms if they are necessary making up things like, &#8220;SAAS&#8221;, &#8220;DAAS&#8221; and &#8220;NAAS&#8221; who are these people trying to kid.  Also haven&#8217;t we been here before to some extent?  Less than a decade ago I seem to remember people talking about ASP&#8217;s being the next big thing, where are they now?</p>
<p>For those of you who don&#8217;t know what I am talking about when I refer to &#8220;Cloud&#8221; lets try and define it because there seems to be a myriad of definitions for it out there doing the circuit.  You have a business, could be small, could be big, it doesn&#8217;t really matter.  You say to yourself rather than doing all that complicated technical stuff needed to run my business or because I don&#8217;t have the resource or startup capital right now I&#8217;ll let someone else handle that .  That person does have the know how, the resources and can spread my cost base over a period of time, and this makes sense you don&#8217;t have to be a genius to see the benefits of doing this.</p>
<h2>Outsourcing</h2>
<p>So however you wrap it up &#8220;Cloud&#8221; is essentially about outsourcing your business processes and assets to an external provider.  You may decide to do this in combination or in a step by step process.  Now for the &#8220;one man and his band&#8221; this may be fine, and as I said earlier you don&#8217;t need to be a genius to see the flexibility that this &#8220;pay as you go&#8221; type service offering gives you.</p>
<h2>But is this right for an enterprise business?</h2>
<p>Would you really outsource all of your core business services, assets, data, intellectual property to a service provider?  If I put my security hat on for a moment I would have to say if as a business you decide to go down this route then you would without doubt be commiting corporate suicide.</p>
<p>Would you put all your confidential data and any other intellectual property you had in a skip on the street?  Would you leave your valuables in your car unlocked?  Would you leave your front door open?  Of course you wouldn&#8217;t unless you were completely stupid, and I am not trying to scare anyone here I am trying to make people think and get some perspective on the situation.</p>
<p>Step back for a second and look at what &#8220;Cloud&#8221; strategy is going to give you. Way up the benefits and then however the marketing people (by the way I don&#8217;t have anything against marketing people!) wrap the wolf up in sheep&#8217;s clothing, strip it bare, get back to basics and ask why am I doing this, what will it achieve that I don&#8217;t already have today or can&#8217;t do in other ways.  Then look at protection, how do I protect myself if I do decide to go down this road to armegeddon.  You may have high security standards and practices, the provider however may not or even if they claim they do, may not bother to implement them for reasons of cost.</p>
<p>Then what about insurance can the provider indemnify you if a security breach occurs?</p>
<p>Unless the provider is very large and lets face it today there are only a handful of those that make up the hundreds of other companies starting to offer cloud services, then the answer is that no insurance underwriter is going to provide those organizations with adequate insurance for indemnity purposes.</p>
<h2>Sharing</h2>
<p>Lets say for a minute you do decide that &#8220;Cloud&#8221; is for you, you like the idea of saving money its going to make you look good in the board room, it will save the organization millions, help you link with new business partners, whatever the reason.</p>
<p>When today a breach occurs that results in you losing thousands of credit card numbers or core IPR of some sort, when you enter the board room tomorrow are you going to look that brilliant.  No you will be making a fast exit but the aftermath to the company you worked for could be catastrophic, share prices could plummit, customer confidence falter, brand reputation suffer, you get the picture.</p>
<h2>FUD</h2>
<p>Am I trying to feed you FUD? (fear, uncertainty and doubt for the uninitiated) well maybe to drive the point home.  The reason I paint the above picture is that if you outsource your assets to a provider you have to be damn certain that you can TRUST them.  Further still it&#8217;s not that you just TRUST them but all the business connections they may have as well as the other customers that are using their services alongside you.  Is the provider offering you dedicated resources or are they shared, and when I talk about sharing I mean at all 7 layers of the OSI model, from the application, to the network to the physical layer.</p>
<p>If these resources are shared which they will be as that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s cheap, how does the &#8220;Cloud&#8221; provider offer you robust security?  How do they guarantee the same levels of security you have today within your own network?  The answer is they can&#8217;t and if they say they can then walk away!</p>
<h2>Attacking management frameworks</h2>
<p>We have already seen attacks on social networking sites, and business sites, most recently at Black Hat 09 in Vegas a talk titled &#8220;Clobbering the Cloud&#8221; showed how researchers compromised the management frameworks of &#8220;Salesforce.com&#8221; to extract data that didn&#8217;t belong to them.</p>
<h2>Virtualization</h2>
<p>So where does virtualization fit into all of this?  vCloud?  VMware have a so called cloud operating system and are making moves into this space in a big way with their own service offerings.  Microsoft and Xen are also starting to do the same thing so virtualization is becoming very much a part of the &#8220;Cloud&#8217;, whether this is the network, the operating systems or applications  Does it complicate things? Does it make things easier?  There is no black and white answer to this if anything depending on your perspective it makes things easier  and it could if implemented correctly be more secure.</p>
<p>Unfortunately history has shown us that even if we have the most technologically advanced system in our grasp, human nature in the end just lets us down, the enigma cipher machine is a classic testimony to this.</p>
<p>Right now I&#8217;m off to get myself a brew in my virtual shed or was that cloud at the bottom of the garden!</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Cloud+computing+suicide+http%3A%2F%2Ftinyurl.com%2F39khx9s" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.vminformer.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter-big3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vminformer.com/cloud-computing-suicide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Researchers cure blue pill virtualization attack</title>
		<link>http://www.vminformer.com/researchers-cure-blue-pill-virtualization-attack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vminformer.com/researchers-cure-blue-pill-virtualization-attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 21:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spiv</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[newsfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VirtSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blue pill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization attack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vminformer.com/?p=1107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two researchers from North Carolina State University have developed software that they say can protect virtualization hypervisors from malicious &#8220;Blue Pill&#8221; rootkit threats. &#8220;HyperSafe enables the hypervisor self-protection from code injection attempts,&#8221; said Xuxian Jiang, an assistant professor of computer science at NCSU. Jiang, along with his PhD. student Zhi Wang, developed the software, called &#8230; <a href="http://www.vminformer.com/researchers-cure-blue-pill-virtualization-attack/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two researchers from North Carolina State University have developed software that they say can protect virtualization hypervisors from malicious &#8220;Blue Pill&#8221; rootkit threats.</p>
<p>&#8220;HyperSafe enables the hypervisor self-protection from code injection attempts,&#8221; said Xuxian Jiang, an assistant professor of computer science at NCSU.</p>
<p>Jiang, along with his PhD. student Zhi Wang, developed the software, called HyperSafe, with funding from the U.S. Army Research Office and the National Science Foundation.</p>
<p>For the rest of this article please follow this link, <a href="http://www.arnnet.com.au/article/345850/researchers_cure_blue_pill_virtualization_attacks/?eid=-217">blue pill.</a></p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Researchers+cure+blue+pill+virtualization+attack+http%3A%2F%2Ftinyurl.com%2F32z2wys" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.vminformer.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter-big3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vminformer.com/researchers-cure-blue-pill-virtualization-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtualization Security FUD?</title>
		<link>http://www.vminformer.com/virtualization-security-fud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vminformer.com/virtualization-security-fud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 22:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spiv</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[newsfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[practical guide to virtualization security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization security fud]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vminformer.com/?p=1094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The main concern I have for anyone searching for practical information about securing their virtual infrastructure is the amount of FUD that is out there. You only have to do a search on google and you know what I am talking about. Sure the vendors themselves have very useful security hardening guides but they are &#8230; <a href="http://www.vminformer.com/virtualization-security-fud/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main concern I have for anyone searching for practical information about securing their virtual infrastructure is the amount of FUD that is out there.  You only have to do a search on google and you know what I am talking about.  Sure the vendors themselves have very useful security hardening guides but they are vendor centric and often don&#8217;t give you a sense of relevance to your organization or needs.  <a href="http://communities.vmware.com/docs/DOC-12306">VMware&#8217;s latest vSphere 4.0 Security hardening guide</a> is somewhat better than its predecessor as  it does try to give the reader a level of relevance in terms of controls as they might pertain to specific environments. Eg. DMZ.</p>
<p>With this in mind I set out to write a short document that would hopefully impart to the reader practical advice on how to secure their virtual environment.  You can check out the document at the following link <a href="http://www.vminformer.com/vminformer/wp/PracticalGuideVirtualizationSecurity.pdf">(A Practical Guide to Securing Your Virtual Environment)</a>, if you like it or even if you don&#8217;t please let me know by leaving your comments below&#8230;(spiv)</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Virtualization+Security+FUD%3F+http%3A%2F%2Ftinyurl.com%2F3y8ldrd" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.vminformer.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter-big3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vminformer.com/virtualization-security-fud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Do You Need Virtual Security Solutions, When You Don&#8217;t Secure Your Physical Network?</title>
		<link>http://www.vminformer.com/why-do-you-need-virtual-security-solutions-when-you-dont-secure-your-physical-network/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vminformer.com/why-do-you-need-virtual-security-solutions-when-you-dont-secure-your-physical-network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spiv</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[newsfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vminformer.com/?p=1067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Putting all your eggs in one basket has never been a great idea – by not securing your virtual environment &#8211; you’re doing just that with your corporate data. Without any security, your virtual host server isn’t far from being an open door &#8211; a direct route into your organisation for pretty much anyone with &#8230; <a href="http://www.vminformer.com/why-do-you-need-virtual-security-solutions-when-you-dont-secure-your-physical-network/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Putting all your eggs in one basket has never been a great idea – by not securing your virtual environment &#8211; you’re doing just that with your corporate data.</h3>
<p>Without any security, your virtual host server isn’t far from being an open door &#8211; a direct route into your organisation for pretty much anyone with a little knowledge  to access, compromise or corrupt every virtual machines you’ve got: not an appealing prospect!<br />
Although it’s not impossible for the same thing to happen in a physical world: most servers and PCs have some form of security layer in their build  – however basic: there probably isn’t a network out there that doesn’t include IDS, Firewalls, DLP or Anti-Virus in some guise. It provides a minimum level of security against internal and external threats that just doesn’t apply in a new virtual infrastructure. Virtual machines’ lack of individual security provision means that unless it’s over-layered at the management level, they’re wide open to attack &#8211; in a way that most PCs or network devices aren’t.<br />
But securing the virtual world isn’t all bad news: a brand new virtual deployment gives you a unique opportunity to implement security policies and procedures from scratch &#8211; using the latest technologies. That’s rarely possible in a physical network where legacy systems, multiple vendor solutions, anomalies and upgrades mean that policies and procedures can be difficult to implement and harder still to enforce or police.<br />
Your HyperVisor and management console are the gatekeepers to your whole virtual infrastructure, so not deploying some form of security solutions to protect them isn’t an option, it’s a necessity –  unless you like scrambled eggs!</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Why+Do+You+Need+Virtual+Security+Solutions%2C+When+You+Don%E2%80%99t+Secure+Your+Physical+Network%3F+http%3A%2F%2Ftinyurl.com%2F34pfp2c" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.vminformer.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter-big3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vminformer.com/why-do-you-need-virtual-security-solutions-when-you-dont-secure-your-physical-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scoobydoo and the case of virtualization insecurity!</title>
		<link>http://www.vminformer.com/scoobydoo-and-the-case-of-virtualization-insecurity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vminformer.com/scoobydoo-and-the-case-of-virtualization-insecurity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spiv</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[newsfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VirtSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization security myths]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vminformer.com/?p=1038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Virtualization Myths Thought I would share this presentation with everyone from a recent seminar that I gave at the back end of last year entitled &#8220;Security in a Virtual World&#8221;. The seminar was well attended and as well as myself there were 2 other speakers one from VMware and the other from Check Point who &#8230; <a href="http://www.vminformer.com/scoobydoo-and-the-case-of-virtualization-insecurity/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Virtualization Myths</h1>
<p><a><br />
<h3>Thought I would share this presentation with everyone from a recent seminar that I gave at the back end of last year entitled &#8220;Security in a Virtual World&#8221;.</h3>
<h3>The seminar was well attended and as well as myself there were 2 other speakers one from VMware and the other from Check Point who were demonstrating there VMsafe Firewall offering.</h3>
<h3>My presentation introduces why you need security in a virtual environment and explores some ideas and is designed to get you thinking about your own architecture before you just simply take the ESX CD and bound off into oblivion.</h3>
<p></a>  </p>
<h4>You can check out the presentation at this link: <a href="http://bit.ly/8Vh4MM">http://bit.ly/8Vh4MM</a></h4>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Scoobydoo+and+the+case+of+virtualization+insecurity%21+http%3A%2F%2Ftinyurl.com%2F39g33tn" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.vminformer.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter-big3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vminformer.com/scoobydoo-and-the-case-of-virtualization-insecurity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMotion fails after an ESX host is port scanned</title>
		<link>http://www.vminformer.com/vmotion-fails-after-being-an-esx-host-is-port-scanned/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vminformer.com/vmotion-fails-after-being-an-esx-host-is-port-scanned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spiv</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[newsfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VirtSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmotion fails]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vminformer.com/?p=1030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This appeared on a VMware KB article back in August but some of you may have not seen it. Basically if you use a port scanner like NMAP and scan an ESX host in particular on port 8000, subsequent VMotion events will fail. The only way to get VMotion to work again is to disable &#8230; <a href="http://www.vminformer.com/vmotion-fails-after-being-an-esx-host-is-port-scanned/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>This appeared on a VMware KB article back in August but some of you may have not seen it.  Basically if you use a port scanner like NMAP and scan an ESX host  in particular on port 8000, subsequent VMotion events will fail.</h3>
<h3>The only way to get VMotion to work again is to disable and then re-enable VMotion.  It&#8217;s interesting that this service is obviously not robust enough to cope with a simple port scan and also highlights the fact that you should be isolating your vmotion network from general network traffic.</h3>
<h4>The original VMware article can be viewed here, <a href="http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&#038;cmd=displayKC&#038;externalId=1010672">KB1010672</a></h4>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=VMotion+fails+after+an+ESX+host+is+port+scanned+http%3A%2F%2Ftinyurl.com%2F3xysd8y" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.vminformer.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter-big3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vminformer.com/vmotion-fails-after-being-an-esx-host-is-port-scanned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

